Adam's Heart Valve Surgery Blog
Double Heart Valve Surgery Patient, Adam Pick, Blogs About
Heart Valve Replacement and Heart Valve Repair Surgery

Encouraging 10-Year Results For The Ross Procedure, Reports Dr. Yacoub

August 13th, 2010

Since having my aortic valve replaced via the Ross Procedure in 2005, I’ve received a number of questions about this unique double heart valve replacement. One of the most common questions is, “Isn’t that operation more risky as two valves are replaced?”

Ross Procedure - Aortic Valve Replacement Results

I have to admit, that is a very fair question. I remember thinking the same thing when both Dr. Trento and Dr. Starnes suggested this relatively uncommon surgical approach. However, as I did my research on the Ross Procedure, the benefits started to outweigh the risks.

Specific to surgical outcomes for the Ross Procedure, new data was just released by heart valve legend, Dr. Magdi Yacoub, which provided encouraging support for having your pulmonary valve switched into the aortic position. Here are the details of the Ross Procedure study:

  • Aortic valve replacement patients under the age of 69 at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust in London were randomly assigned to two groups between 1994 and 2001.
  • The first group of 108 patients had their aortic valve replaced with their own pulmonary valve (also known as an autograft). Their pulmonary valve was replaced with one harvested from a donor (a homograft).
  • The remaining 108 patients had their malfunctioning aortic valve replaced with one from a donor.

The results of the study were:

  • There was one death during or after surgery in the group receiving their own valve, compared to three among those assigned to receive a donor valve.
  • After 10 years, four patients in the autograft group had died, compared with 15 in the homograft set. This meant that the survival rate a decade later was 97% in the first group and 83% in the second.

Yacoub noted, “Our results support the hypothesis that a living valve implanted in the aortic position can lead to significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients”. They say that the technique “was associated with improved freedom from reoperation and quality of life”.

As you prepare for surgery, you may learn relatively quickly that there are multiple options specific to heart valve surgery – the surgeon, the surgical approach (e.g. sternotomy, minimally invasive)and the valve replacement device (e.g. tissue, mechanical). This post is not intended to suggest that the Ross Procedure is for everyone needing aortic valve replacement. Rather, I share this information to enhance your awareness to the different options available to you.

Keep on tickin!

About The Author: Adam Pick is a double, heart valve surgery patient and author of The Patient's Guide To Heart Valve Surgery. This unique book integrates clinical research with the personal experiences of 135 former patients to help future patients and their caregivers better understand the problems, the opportunities and the realities of heart valve surgery. To learn more about Adam and his heart valve surgery book, click here.

4 Comments... Click here to add one.


Pat says on August 14th, 2010 at 1:23 pm

High
I was wondering if there was a link \site that you could advise me of that shows the outcomes\stats of various doctors that perform aortic surgery -I am located in Ct and am looking for a doctor in my area. I do have a couple of referrals but want to do some research on them and there outcomes
Thank you so much
Pat

 


ruthmcc says on August 14th, 2010 at 2:07 pm

what is the 5 year mortality rate between a st jude mechanical or tissue valve aortic?

 


Dr. Hassan Tehrani says on August 18th, 2010 at 6:25 pm

Dear Ruth,
The 5-yr mortality rates are essentially similar for both valves types. The difference is the failure rates in the long-run. The mechanical valves are essentially good for life. The tissue valves are only good for on average 15 years. In patients under the age of 60, surgeons usually implant a mechanical valve.
Dr. Hassan Tehrani
Consultant Cardiac Surgeon
Artemis Health Institute

 


Graeme says on August 31st, 2010 at 7:28 pm

hi,
I had the Ross Op. 12 years ago and it was a complete success, back at work after 3 weeks and no medication. 12 years later still feeling great, went in for a very long overdue checkup and found I had Aortic Root Dilalation balooning out 5.5cm, bacically stuffed with no side effects. When reading my report the surgeon who did my original op. said Oh S**t why me. He proformed the op. last month and I now have a mechanical valve with warfaren. I was up and walking the next day with only 4 nights in hospital, very little pain and back at work in 2 weeks. This time round has been a breeze, though its probably more due to the skill of the surgeon and his team to whom I’ll always be grateful. Asking why I now have a mechanical valve his answer was “I don’t want to see you again”

Graeme

 

Leave a Reply

(required)
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation

  #1 Recommended Book
  For Patients & Caregivers