<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Danger Of Angiogram? Risks Of Angiography?</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2007/09/03/danger-of-angiogram-risks-of-angiography/#comment-6832</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2007/09/03/danger-of-angiogram-risks-of-angiography/#comment-6832</guid>
					<description>I know personally four people who had catastrophic strokes due to angiograms.  If the risk of serious side-effects from this procedure is so low (one web site says .03% - .3%) what is the statistical liklihood that one non-medical person (I) could personally know four people whose lives were ruined by this procedure?  I believe the risk to be much higher. Besides, out of one million procedures, a risk level of .3% is 3,000 people.  That's about as many as were killed in the World Trade Center towers.  No thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know personally four people who had catastrophic strokes due to angiograms.  If the risk of serious side-effects from this procedure is so low (one web site says .03% - .3%) what is the statistical liklihood that one non-medical person (I) could personally know four people whose lives were ruined by this procedure?  I believe the risk to be much higher. Besides, out of one million procedures, a risk level of .3% is 3,000 people.  That&#8217;s about as many as were killed in the World Trade Center towers.  No thanks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
