I thought I would at last enter some information into this journal. This website and Adam Pick's guide to heart valve ...Read more
Hello, HeartValveSurgery friends!
I thought I would at last enter some information into this journal. This website and Adam Pick's guide to heart valve surgery have been very helpful to me.
I was diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve around the year 2000 (although I was known to have a heart murmur since childhood). The valve has been monitored since then with yearly echocardiograms, CT scans, and an MRI in 2015. I have been, and continue to be, asymptomatic. I exercise regularly, take long walks and cycle when weather permits on the weekends. (I only cycle on trails, cycling in car traffic makes me nervous.) My main problem is aortic regurgitation, although mild calcification was noted on my last CT scan). Due to changes in insurance as well as doctor relocations, I've had four cardiologists since my diagnosis.
In 2023 my cardiologist said he thought it might be time for surgery based on my latest scans which indicated severe regurgitation. I was surprised as I hadn't noticed any detrimental changes. So I underwent a heart catheterization and met with a surgeon at the same hospital as my cardiologist.
I didn't care much for this guy. I didn't feel welcomed from the get-go. He remarked that I was "very young to be having heart valve surgery," and, "Most of my patients are in their 70s and 80s." I was 57 years old at the time, and we here all know that while many patients are in their 70s and 80s, heart valve patients come in all ages. He also said he would only consider a mechanical valve due to my age, and if I wanted a bioprosthetic valve he would recommend me to another surgeon. He wanted to "pencil me in" for a surgery date, the sooner the better. It felt like being pressured by a car salesman.
I think I would have got a second opinion for such a major surgery, but Adam Pick's book reinforced that decision. I found a surgeon that was recommended on this site, in fact Adam has interviewed him (twice, I think). I had my medical records transferred to the new surgeon and had more scans done at the new hospital. Curiously, my new scans now indicated mild regurgitation (the last scan at the old hospital indicated severe regurgitation... I don't know what's going on there).
To make an already long story short(er), the new surgeon said that surgery was not needed at this time but would most likely be needed in the future. I was stunned, really. I mostly wanted to find a surgeon I was comfortable with and respected my choice (I was leaning toward a bioprosthetic valve rather than mechanical). This was in 2023. My scans from last year showed negligible change, and I'm scheduled for new scans this year in May.
I hope this story emphasizes the importance of a second opinion and feeling comfortable with your doctors and surgeons.
Robert Miller Thank you for the feedback. Indeed, getting a second or even third opinion is essential. While this p ... Read more
Robert Miller Thank you for the feedback. Indeed, getting a second or even third opinion is essential. While this procedure is preformed frequently, mostly without any complication, one has to be prepared for it. Adam's site is a great source to come up with a list of questions you want to ask. If possible, bring another person with you who can take notes and make sure all your questions have been addressed or any other questions come up based on the discussion (there will be). Getting other options also helps you crystalize out surgeons that have revenue as a major goal, that are self-centric, that don't engage with the patient much, etc. I didn't have much time for the first surgery but for my second one I had plenty of time. This was with Dr. Castro who is not just very skillful and has done thousands of surgeries, but he is very forthcoming, takes all the time you need, makes sure you understand everything, etc. That's the kind of surgeon you want.
Rose Madura Hi Kenneth. I was once told that the person doing the echo can make the difference between a good ech ... Read more
Rose Madura Hi Kenneth. I was once told that the person doing the echo can make the difference between a good echo and a bad echo meaning the results can vary. I'm happy you got a second opinion and best wishes as you embark on this journey of heart valve surgery. š
Susan Lynn We're all about multiple opinions! Glad you got one! Medicine is becoming a business and doctors ... Read more
Susan Lynn We're all about multiple opinions! Glad you got one! Medicine is becoming a business and doctors are often like pushy salespeople! Make the choice that's right for you.
Pamela Gregory So glad you got a 2nd opinion. I think with such a huge surgery you need more than one person who th... Read more
Pamela Gregory So glad you got a 2nd opinion. I think with such a huge surgery you need more than one person who thinks it is necessary! I got a tissue valve at 55 and am comfortable with that decision. Just make sure new valve is big enough for TAVR in the future.
I thought I would at last enter some information into this journal. This website and Adam Pick's guide to heart valve ...Read more
I thought I would at last enter some information into this journal. This website and Adam Pick's guide to heart valve surgery have been very helpful to me.
I was diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve around the year 2000 (although I was known to have a heart murmur since childhood). The valve has been monitored since then with yearly echocardiograms, CT scans, and an MRI in 2015. I have been, and continue to be, asymptomatic. I exercise regularly, take long walks and cycle when weather permits on the weekends. (I only cycle on trails, cycling in car traffic makes me nervous.) My main problem is aortic regurgitation, although mild calcification was noted on my last CT scan). Due to changes in insurance as well as doctor relocations, I've had four cardiologists since my diagnosis.
In 2023 my cardiologist said he thought it might be time for surgery based on my latest scans which indicated severe regurgitation. I was surprised as I hadn't noticed any detrimental changes. So I underwent a heart catheterization and met with a surgeon at the same hospital as my cardiologist.
I didn't care much for this guy. I didn't feel welcomed from the get-go. He remarked that I was "very young to be having heart valve surgery," and, "Most of my patients are in their 70s and 80s." I was 57 years old at the time, and we here all know that while many patients are in their 70s and 80s, heart valve patients come in all ages. He also said he would only consider a mechanical valve due to my age, and if I wanted a bioprosthetic valve he would recommend me to another surgeon. He wanted to "pencil me in" for a surgery date, the sooner the better. It felt like being pressured by a car salesman.
I think I would have got a second opinion for such a major surgery, but Adam Pick's book reinforced that decision. I found a surgeon that was recommended on this site, in fact Adam has interviewed him (twice, I think). I had my medical records transferred to the new surgeon and had more scans done at the new hospital. Curiously, my new scans now indicated mild regurgitation (the last scan at the old hospital indicated severe regurgitation... I don't know what's going on there).
To make an already long story short(er), the new surgeon said that surgery was not needed at this time but would most likely be needed in the future. I was stunned, really. I mostly wanted to find a surgeon I was comfortable with and respected my choice (I was leaning toward a bioprosthetic valve rather than mechanical). This was in 2023. My scans from last year showed negligible change, and I'm scheduled for new scans this year in May.
I hope this story emphasizes the importance of a second opinion and feeling comfortable with your doctors and surgeons.