<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bicuspid Aortic Valve In Newborn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/</link>
	<description>Former Patient And Author, Adam Pick, Blogs About Heart Valve Replacement And Heart Valve Repair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynn houser</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/comment-page-1/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>lynn houser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>i have a 2 mo old infant that has a bicuspid valve i found this out when she was 2 weeks old, but her dr&#039;s thought it was a heart murmur, it was&#039;nt.
she went to a heart dr. and the advise they gave me was she will be fine they did&#039;nt see any leaking and she should live a healthy life.
should i second quess this and insist on more testing or just have her yearly exam a hope for the best? i need all the info i can get on this subject, beause her heart dr was short and breif and i have been left to try and research this problem on my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a 2 mo old infant that has a bicuspid valve i found this out when she was 2 weeks old, but her dr&#8217;s thought it was a heart murmur, it was&#8217;nt.<br />
she went to a heart dr. and the advise they gave me was she will be fine they did&#8217;nt see any leaking and she should live a healthy life.<br />
should i second quess this and insist on more testing or just have her yearly exam a hope for the best? i need all the info i can get on this subject, beause her heart dr was short and breif and i have been left to try and research this problem on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>http://jtcs.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/4/901

Is this what you were referencing from...now I am DEFINITELY speaking to my sons pediatric cardiologist about this!!!!!!

Theresa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://jtcs.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/4/901" rel="nofollow">http://jtcs.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/4/901</a></p>
<p>Is this what you were referencing from&#8230;now I am DEFINITELY speaking to my sons pediatric cardiologist about this!!!!!!</p>
<p>Theresa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/heart-surgery-blog/2008/03/24/bicuspid-aortic-valve-in-newborn/#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>Adam that was interesting..you answered a question I had been pondering of most recent.  If bicuspid valves are replaced and if aortic stenosis pressures are relieved(if only temporarily stretched that is) by valvuloplasty then why is there still a risk of aneurysm with blood flow being normal or near normal..the connective tissue argument then sounds quite likely...interesting...I look forward to reading more of your findings in the future..I am going to bring this up with my sons cardiologist in April.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam that was interesting..you answered a question I had been pondering of most recent.  If bicuspid valves are replaced and if aortic stenosis pressures are relieved(if only temporarily stretched that is) by valvuloplasty then why is there still a risk of aneurysm with blood flow being normal or near normal..the connective tissue argument then sounds quite likely&#8230;interesting&#8230;I look forward to reading more of your findings in the future..I am going to bring this up with my sons cardiologist in April.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

